
The risk of not detecting a material misstatement resulting from fraud is higher than for one
resulting from error, as fraud may involve collusion, forgery, intentional omissions,
misrepresentations, or the override of internal control.
—
Obtain an understanding of internal control relevant to the audit in order to design audit
procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing
an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control.
—
Evaluate the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of
accounting estimates and related disclosures made by the Board of Directors
.
—
Conclude on the appropriateness of the Board of Directors'
use of the going concern basis
of accounting and, based on the audit evidence obtained, whether a material uncertainty
exists related to events or conditions that may cast significant doubt on the Company’s
ability to continue as a going concern. If we conclude that a material uncertainty exists, we
are required to draw attention in our report of the “réviseur d’entreprises agréé” to the
related disclosures in the financial statements or, if such disclosures are inadequate, to
modify our opinion. Our conclusions are based on the audit evidence obtained up to the
date of our report of the “réviseur d’entreprises agréé”. However, future events or conditions
may cause the Company to cease to continue as a going concern.
—
Evaluate the overall presentation, structure and content of the financial statements,
including the disclosures, and whether the financial statements represent the underlying
transactions and events in a manner that achieves fair presentation.
We communicate with those charged with governance regarding, among other matters, the
planned scope and timing of the audit and significant audit findings, including any significant
deficiencies in internal control that we identify during our audit.
We also provide those charged with governance with a statement that we have complied with
relevant ethical requirements regarding independence, and to communicate with them all
relationships and other matters that may reasonably be thought to bear on our independence,
and where applicable, actions taken to eliminate threats or safeguards applied.
From the matters communicated with those charged with governance, we determine those
matters that were of most significance in the audit of the financial statements of the current
period and are therefore the key audit matters. We describe these matters in our report unless
law or regulation precludes public disclosure about the matter.
Report on other legal and regulatory requirements
We have been appointed as “réviseur d’entreprises agréé” by the General Meeting of the
Shareholders on 21 November 2025 and the duration of our uninterrupted engagement,
including previous renewals and reappointments, is 11 year(s).
We confirm that the prohibited non-audit services referred to in the EU Regulation N° 537/2014
were not provided and that we remained independent of the Company in conducting the audit.
We have checked the compliance of the financial statements of the Company as at 31
December 2025 with relevant statutory requirements set out in the ESEF Regulation that are
applicable to financial statements.
For the Company it relates to:
—
financial statements prepared in a valid xHTML format;
In our opinion, the financial statements of Bridgepoint Direct Lending I SV S.A. as at 31
December 2025, identified as 5493003U4YAHFL0F5P11-2025-12-31-1-en.Xhtml, have been
prepared, in all material respects, in compliance with the requirements laid down in the ESEF
Regulation.